Transculturality as a perspective: Researching media cultures comparatively

Author(s): Andreas Hepp

Year of publication: 2009

Keywords: Media cultures, Deterritorialization, Comparative media research, Cultural construction, Globalization, National-territorial frame, Translocal phenomena, Media globalization

Methodology/Sample: _/_

Reference: Hepp, A. (2009). Transculturality as a Perspective: Researching Media Cultures Comparatively. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-10.1.1221

Abstract

Most of the research on media cultures operates in a “national-territorial” frame. Media cultures are considered as national cultures and other forms of media culture (for example professional journalism cultures, diasporas, celebrity cultures etc.) are not investigated in their “deterritorial” character. But it is exactly such deterritorial forms of media culture that are gaining relevance with the ongoing pace of media globalization: they therefore have to be placed in the focus of comparative media and communication research. Starting with this consideration, the article develops a transcultural perspective on researching media cultures. Within this perspective it becomes possible to conduct comparative research on (territorial) national media cultures as well as on other (deterritorial) forms of present media cultures, as this approach moves the processes of cultural construction and articulation into the focus of analysis. To arrive at a better understanding of this approach, “media cultures” are defined as translocal phenomena in their territorial as well as their deterritorial relations. Based on this, the “semantics” of a transcultural research perspective are outlined, which then makes it possible to formulate practical principles for carrying out comparative qualitative research within this framework.

> Summary

  • The paper critiques the national-territorial frame in media culture research, advocating for a transcultural perspective to include deterritorial forms.
  • It emphasizes the importance of understanding media cultures as translocal phenomena, considering both territorial and deterritorial aspects.
  • The article outlines practical principles for conducting comparative qualitative research within a transcultural framework.
  • It highlights the relevance of global media capitalism in shaping media communication across different regions.

> Problem statement

  • The paper critiques the national-territorial frame in media culture research, emphasizing the need for a transcultural perspective.
  • It highlights the growing relevance of deterritorial forms of media culture amid media globalization.
  • The research aims to redefine “media cultures” as translocal phenomena, addressing both territorial and deterritorial aspects.
  • It seeks to develop practical principles for comparative qualitative research within a transcultural framework.
  • The complexity of media cultures necessitates a critical approach to understanding power relations and cultural articulation.

> Methods used

  • The paper discusses a transcultural research perspective for analyzing media cultures.
  • It suggests a three-step qualitative research approach for media cultures.
  • Standardized content analyses are proposed to interpret transcultural specificities.
  • The research emphasizes comparative analysis across different cultural contexts.
  • It aims to understand cultural construction processes through qualitative methods.

> Practical implications

  • The paper emphasizes the need for a transcultural research perspective in media studies, focusing on both national and deterritorial media cultures.
  • It suggests that comparative research should include diverse forms of media culture, such as diasporas and celebrity cultures.
  • The article outlines practical principles for conducting qualitative research within a transcultural framework.
  • It highlights the importance of understanding media cultures as translocal phenomena, which can inform research methodologies.
  • The implications extend to recognizing the role of global media capitalism in shaping media communication across different regions.

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.