Toward a model of global meaning making

Author(s): Robert J. Tierney

Year of publication: 2018

Keywords: Global meaning making, Cross-cultural epistemologies, Indigenous ways of knowing, Decolonization, Critical reflexivity

Methodology/Sample: _/_

Reference: Tierney, R. J. (2018). Toward a model of global meaning making. Journal of Literacy Research, 50(4), 397-422. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X18803134

Abstract

Drawing upon tenets of critical theory, cultural capital, global epistemologies, decolonization, Indigenous ways of knowing, mobility and translanguaging, ethics, and global citizenship, this article proposes a model of cross-cultural meaning making and worldly reading as a foundation for global epistemological eclecticism in our research and pedagogical pursuits. The imaginary represents an aspirational model in the interest of decolonizing and supporting “other”—notably confronting western exclusivity and racism and mobilizing epistemologies of southern scholars and Indigenous communities.

> Summary

  • The paper proposes a model for cross-cultural meaning-making and worldly reading, emphasizing global epistemological eclecticism in research and pedagogy.
  • It critiques Western exclusivity and racism while advocating for the inclusion of Indigenous and southern scholars’ epistemologies.
  • The model is informed by critical theory, cultural capital, decolonization, and translanguaging, highlighting the importance of ethics and global citizenship.

> Problem statement

  • The paper discusses the colonial impact on Indigenous education systems, highlighting the need for decolonization and respect for diverse epistemologies.
  • It emphasizes the lack of teacher knowledge regarding Indigenous cultural ways of knowing, perpetuating mainstream practices.
  • The forced hierarchy between European and African educational systems is identified as a significant issue.
  • There is a call for systemic policy changes to foster constructive dialogue between Indigenous and colonial knowledge systems.
  • The paper critiques the absence of mechanisms to empower Indigenous systems, which were historically marginalized.

> Methods used

Not addressed in the paper.

> Practical implications

  • The paper proposes a model for cross-cultural meaning making, emphasizing global epistemological eclecticism in research and pedagogy.
  • It highlights the need for diverse, adaptable spaces for meaning making, informed by cultural and ethical considerations.
  • The authors stress the importance of understanding Indigenous ways of knowing to disrupt colonial educational practices.
  • The paper advocates for a decolonial orientation, challenging Western exclusivity and promoting Southern epistemologies.
  • It suggests that educators must interrogate their practices to better serve diverse student populations.
  • The implications include fostering respectful engagements that prioritize community interests over profit or political ambitions.

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.