Safe/brave spaces in virtual exchange on sustainability

Author(s): Malin R. Glimäng

Year of publication: 2022

Keywords: Transnational virtual exchange (TVE), Sustainability, Critical intercultural awareness, Safe/brave spaces, Global citizenship education (GCE)

Methodology/Sample: Exploratory practice/54 students

Reference: Glimäng, M. R. (2022). Safe/brave spaces in virtual exchange on sustainability. Journal of Virtual Exchange, 5, 61-81. https://doi.org/10.21827/jve.5.38369

Abstract

This article explores the potential for fostering critical intercultural and global awareness through Transnational Virtual Exchange (TVE) focused on sustainability. The study is based on a lingua franca exchange between university students in Argentina, Poland, and Sweden. A qualitative content analysis of student e-portfolios unveiled reflective dimensions construed here as safe/brave spaces, echoing Andreotti’s (2006) notion of soft versus critical global citizenship education. Using theories of critical interculturality and third space, the analysis shows potential for developing participants’ critical reflection through TVE. However, the findings also reveal how in-depth reflection is often a lonely endeavor, overshadowed by project tasks that might unintentionally steer learners toward safe topics and consensus. So far, critical reflection is an underexplored area in empirical Virtual Exchange (VE) research. Student voices in this study bring to the fore questions regarding what it means to approach global citizenship education critically through online collaboration. The findings have implications for future design of VE projects where the focus is on social change through action-oriented tasks, but where critical and dialogic reflection after the completion of a pedagogical task is the salient part.

> Summary

  • The paper explores fostering critical intercultural and global awareness through Transnational Virtual Exchange (TVE) focused on sustainability.
  • It highlights the challenges of discussing sensitive topics due to linguistic barriers and time constraints.
  • The study reveals a tendency to prioritize safe topics over complex global issues.
  • Findings suggest that critical reflection is often overshadowed by project tasks, limiting deeper engagement.
  • The research emphasizes the need for future VE designs to encourage critical and dialogic reflection.

> Problem statement

  • The paper explores fostering critical intercultural and global awareness through Transnational Virtual Exchange (TVE) focused on sustainability.
  • It highlights challenges in negotiating global misunderstandings and complexities in sustainable development discussions.
  • Students often settled for safe topics, avoiding deeper engagement with controversial issues due to various barriers.
  • The findings indicate a need for critical reflection in Virtual Exchange projects to address local/global dimensions effectively.

> Methods used

  • The study employs qualitative content analysis to process data from student e-portfolios.
  • Action research is utilized to improve practice through cycles of design, action, observation, and reflection.
  • The author adopts a dual role as both teacher and researcher in the trilateral TVE.
  • Member-checking with practitioner researchers corroborates the final analysis.
  • The study focuses on fostering critical intercultural and global awareness through Transnational Virtual Exchange.

> Practical implications

  • The study highlights the need for critical reflection in Transnational Virtual Exchange (TVE) to enhance global citizenship education.
  • It suggests designing VE projects that prioritize social change through action-oriented tasks and critical reflection.
  • The findings indicate that students should engage with complex global issues rather than settling for safe topics.
  • The research emphasizes the importance of addressing socioeconomic disparities, such as unequal internet access, in collaborative projects.
  • It calls for creating safe spaces as a starting point for deeper engagement with controversial issues.

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.