Author(s): Thomas T. Lennerfors, Kiyoshi Murata
Year of publication: 2021
Keywords: Intercultural information ethics (IIE), Culture, Cross-cultural research, Non-essentialism
Methodology/Sample: _/_
Reference: Lennerfors, T. T., & Murata, K. (2021). Culture as Suture: on the Use of “Culture” in Cross-Cultural Studies in and Beyond Intercultural Information Ethics. The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, 15(1), 71-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12626-021-00080-x
Abstract
Intercultural information ethics (IIE), a field which draws on the limits and richness of human morality and moral thinking in different societies, epochs and philosophic traditions as well as on their impact on today’s social appropriation of information and communication technology, has been argued to lack an adequate theoretical understanding of culture. In this paper, we take a non-essentialist view of culture as a point of departure and discuss not what culture is, but what we (both in our everyday lives, and as researchers) do when we use the concept of culture. To do so, we look for inspiration in the concept of suture, a concept which means the thread which stitches, or the act of stitching, a wound, but has had a long and intricate journey within psychoanalysis and film studies concerning the issue of identification. Three understandings of the use of culture emerge: suture as cultural misidentification, the evil in the cultural suture, and multiple, repeated cultural sutures. We use these categories to diagnose the use of culture in IIE and beyond, and suggest that the use of culture as multiple, repeated sutures—in other words, a recognition that we constantly fail in describing culture or cultural differences, and that each suture is coloured by its conditions of production, and that we cannot but suture with culture anyway—might be a way forward for cross-cultural research.
> Summary
- The paper explores culture through the lens of suture, emphasizing its complex, non-essentialist nature.
- It critiques the simplistic treatment of culture in Intercultural Information Ethics (IIE).
- The authors propose viewing culture as multiple, incomplete sutures shaped by various conditions of production.
- The study advocates for a nuanced understanding of culture to avoid ethnocentrism and essentialism.
- Ultimately, it suggests that recognizing cultural sutures can enhance cross-cultural research.
> Problem statement
- The paper argues that the field of Intercultural Information Ethics (IIE) lacks an adequate theoretical understanding of culture.
- Ethnocentrism remains a predominant issue in IIE, despite extensive scholarship.
- The dominant theories of culture in IIE are criticized for being essentialist and overly rigid.
- The paper highlights the need for a non-essentialist view of culture to address these shortcomings.
- It emphasizes the importance of recognizing culture as multiple, repeated sutures rather than fixed identities.
> Methods used
- The paper employs a non-essentialist view of culture as a foundational method for analysis.
- It explores the concept of suture to understand cultural interactions.
- The research utilizes three interpretations of suture to analyze cultural concepts.
- It advocates for a playful and creative discussion about culture’s role in intercultural information ethics (IIE).
- The study emphasizes the importance of exposing conditions of cultural production.
> Practical implications
- The paper suggests a non-essentialist view of culture, promoting a nuanced understanding in intercultural information ethics (IIE).
- It advocates for recognizing culture as multiple, repeated sutures, acknowledging the complexity of cultural differences.
- The authors encourage researchers to explore the conditions of production influencing cultural interpretations.
- The paper highlights the need to address ethnocentrism within IIE, which remains a persistent issue.
- It calls for a more playful and creative discussion about culture, moving beyond rigid frameworks.

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.