Author(s): Joris Vlieghe
Year of publication: 2016
Keywords: Education, Digitization, Literacy training, Traditional literacy, Digital literacy
Methodology/Sample: _/_
Reference: Vlieghe, J. (2016). Education, Digitization and Literacy training: A historical and cross-cultural perspective. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(6), 549-562. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2015.1044928
Abstract
In this article, I deal with the transition from traditional ‘school’ forms of instruction to educational processes that are fully mediated by digital technologies. Against the background of the idea the very institution ‘school’ is closely linked to the invention of the alphabetic writing system and to the need of initiating new generations into a literate culture, I focus on the issue of literacy training. I argue that with the digitization of education, a fundamental transition takes place regarding what it means to be literate, but also what it means to educate and to be educated. I do so by developing a ‘techno-somatic’ approach, which means that I look at the use of concrete instructional technologies, and the bodily disciplines that are involved. I set out a double comparison in which I contrast existing, ‘traditional’ ways of learning how to read/write with the way in which literacy training looked like before the nineteenth century, on the one hand, and with the initiation into literacy in the Chinese/Japanese language, on the other hand. I argue that these comparisons shed light on the differences between traditional and digital literacy. More precisely, I show that in each case, a different relation toward what it means to produce script is involved. As such, both forms of literacy go together with different spaces of experience and senses of being-able, and therefore with altogether different ideas of what education is all about.
> Summary
- The paper discusses the transition from traditional literacy instruction to digital literacy training in education.
- It argues that digitization fundamentally changes the meaning of being literate and educated.
- A ‘techno-somatic’ approach is developed, focusing on technologies and bodily practices in literacy.
- The author contrasts traditional literacy with literacy in Chinese and Japanese languages to highlight differences.
- The paper emphasizes that different literacies involve distinct experiences and conceptions of education.
> Problem statement
- The paper discusses the transition from traditional education to digital technologies in literacy training.
- It argues that digitization fundamentally changes the meaning of literacy and education.
- The author contrasts traditional literacy training with digital literacy practices.
- The problem of how technologies shape educational aims and practices is emphasized.
- The paper highlights the need for a techno-somatic approach to understand these changes.
> Methods used
- The paper employs a ‘techno-somatic’ approach to analyze educational processes mediated by digital technologies.
- It contrasts traditional literacy training with digital literacy practices.
- The author examines the bodily disciplines involved in using various technologies.
- A phenomenological mapping of experiences with different writing implements is also discussed.
- The paper critiques the mechanization of writing and its impact on literacy.
> Practical implications
- The paper emphasizes the need for a curriculum that includes digital literacy training from an early stage.
- It suggests a shift from traditional literacy methods to those mediated by digital technologies.
- The author advocates for understanding the phenomenological differences in writing experiences with various technologies.
- Acknowledging the dual nature of technology, the paper highlights both beneficial and detrimental uses of digital tools.
- The findings encourage educators to rethink literacy training in light of digital advancements.
