Author(s): Mia Perry
Year of publication: 2021
Keywords: Functional literacy, Sociocultural literacy, Affect theory, Relationality, Posthumanism, Pluriversality, Decolonial theory, Sustainability, Literacy policy, Anthropocene
Methodology/Sample: _/_
Reference: Perry, M. (2021). Pluriversal literacies: Affect and relationality in vulnerable times. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(2), 293-309. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.312
Abstract
Through a consideration of literacies in theory and international policy, this article pushes at the edges of existing frameworks of functional and sociocultural literacies. In critique of existing policy directives, the author explores an approach to literacy that engages in the affective and posthuman relationality of human and environment and in the plurality of literacies globally that are overshadowed in prevailing models of literacy education. The author was motivated by a commitment to literacy education responsive to a world that is unsustainable in its current practices, to a world that faces increasing fragmentation and vulnerability (socially and ecologically) while certain types of expertise, technologies, and global infrastructures continue to proliferate. As a mainstay of education and a tool of social change, literacies are inseparable from policy and practices of sustainability, equity, and development. Pluriversality is a concept emerging from decolonial theory that provides a counternarrative to contemporary Northern assumptions of the universal. Building on a history of ideas around pluriversality gives sociopolitical and ecological momentum to affect and relationality in literacy studies. The author challenges normative constructions of literacy education as Eurocentric and neocolonial, effectively supporting a pedagogy that normalizes certain practices and people and, by extension, sustains inequity and environmental degradation. Through interwoven research projects, the author highlights the contentious aspects of functional and sociocultural approaches to literacy and the possibilities of moving beyond them. In doing so, the author describes and demonstrates the practical and political implications of affect theory and relationality in literacies education in a plural anthropocenic world
> Summary
- The paper critiques existing literacy frameworks, emphasizing the need for a pluralistic approach to literacy education globally.
- It highlights the interplay of affect theory and relationality in literacy practices.
- The author challenges Eurocentric and neocolonial perspectives in literacy education, advocating for sustainability and equity.
- The concept of pluriversal literacies is introduced, promoting diverse literacy practices across different contexts.
- The paper calls for integrating various literacies to address social and ecological challenges in education.
> Problem statement
- The paper critiques existing functional literacy policies as narrow and Eurocentric, marginalizing diverse literacies globally.
- It highlights the ecological and social crises exacerbated by current literacy practices.
- The author argues for a broader understanding of literacy that includes relational human experiences and challenges dominant frameworks.
- The paper emphasizes the need for literacy education that addresses inequities and environmental degradation.
- It identifies the dangers of functional literacy as both a promise and an obligation within global policy.
> Methods used
- The paper critiques existing literacy frameworks through a theoretical lens, focusing on affective and posthuman relationality.
- It employs a pluriversal approach to literacy education, challenging Eurocentric and neocolonial perspectives.
- The author utilizes interwoven research projects to highlight contentious aspects of literacy practices.
- Practical and political implications of affect theory in literacy education are demonstrated.
- The study emphasizes the importance of engaging with diverse literacies across global contexts.
> Practical implications
- The paper critiques existing literacy models, advocating for a broader understanding of literacies that includes affective and posthuman relationality.
- It emphasizes the need for literacies that respond to ecological and social vulnerabilities, promoting sustainability and equity.
- The author highlights the importance of pluriversality in literacy education, challenging Eurocentric and neocolonial perspectives.
- The implications suggest a shift towards inclusive pedagogies that recognize diverse literacies and their contexts.
- The paper calls for frameworks that accommodate the complexities of human and environmental interrelations in literacy practices.

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.