Culture and learning in the context of globalization: Research directions

Author(s): Wan S. E. Lam

Year of publication: 2006

Keywords: Turkish language, German Turks, Transnational identities, Migration, Diaspora studies

Methodology/Sample: _/_

Reference: Lam, W. S. E. (2006). Culture and learning in the context of globalization: Research directions. Review of research in education, 30(1), 213-237. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X030001213

Abstract

The goal of this chapter is to lay out some new conceptualizations and research directions for understanding the relation of culture and learning in the shifting terrains of globalized economies and media flows, youth cultures, and transnational migration. In a time when young people’s experiences and life pathways are increasingly forged in the overlapping social and cultural spaces between economies and societies, there is a need to develop new approaches to working with issues of diversity that go beyond static, territorial, and state-bound categories to address the multiple kinds of intercultural transactions that characterize collective lives in the contemporary era. To this end, the author identifies the limitations of current formulations of cultural diversity that have restricted it to a “minority” issue within the locality of the nation-state. She draws on a social practice and transcultural perspective to discuss promising research directions for studying new formations of culture, community, identity, and processes of learning as young people interact with diverse others in the globalized spaces of media and migration. This discussion highlights the need to reconsider notions of culture and identity, of agency and learning, and of societal engagement and education of the multicultural youth population. In closing, she proposes some conceptual frames for developing an educational research agenda that engages with the new openings for cosmopolitanism and intercultural learning engendered by global conditions.

> Summary

  • The paper discusses intercultural capital in globalized learning contexts.
  • It emphasizes the importance of digital transcultures in education.
  • Affinity group identities shape learning and cultural practices.
  • The abstract highlights immigration debates and labor migration issues.

> Problem statement

  • The paper discusses limitations of cultural diversity as a “minority” issue.
  • It critiques the cultural deficit model in education and its pervasive ideologies.
  • The assimilation model views immigrant students’ “foreignness” as a problem to remediate.
  • It highlights the need for new approaches to diversity beyond static categories.
  • The paper emphasizes reconsidering culture, identity, and societal engagement in education.
  • The abstract mentions the immigration debate and its impact on public consciousness.

> Methods used

  • The paper employs ethnographic studies to explore Internet communications.
  • It examines digital transcultures and their impact on learning practices.
  • The research analyzes collective identities through affinity groups.
  • It investigates the relationality of knowledge in digital spaces.
  • The abstract discusses immigration debates and economic restructuring.

> Practical implications

  • New approaches are needed for diversity in education and societal engagement.
  • Rethinking culture and identity is essential for multicultural youth education.
  • Understanding transnational identities can enhance educational models for migrants.
  • The paper suggests research directions for culture and learning in globalization.
  • The immigration debate highlights the need for informed policy discussions.

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.